The Ties That Bind: The Anglican Communion

That creaking noise you hear comes from ruptures within the Worldwide Anglican Communion that this General Convention could deepen. On matters of biblical interpretation and polity, particularly as they relate to such issues as same-gender blessings and the proposed Anglican Covenant, it’s clear that provinces within the communion are heading down different paths.

Perhaps that division is inevitable. But any break in the communion should be a matter of grave concern for U.S. Episcopalians. The Anglican Communion is not just a messy mix of churches claiming roots in Canterbury. It’s a richly diverse communion of faith united, not just by our English traditions, but by the prayer-book liturgies at the heart of our worship, as well as the blend of sacramental worship and accessibility that have helped define our “middle way.” From the Solomon Islands to Africa, Argentina and Nevada, we are a communion of Christians whose diversity offers wonderful opportunities for spiritual growth and for collaborative partnerships.

Two other members of the Diocese of Virginia and I are about to see the richness of that communion firsthand. We are heading to the Diocese of Bukavu, amid the lakeside hills of eastern Congo near the border with Rwanda. We will talk and pray with Anglicans from the Democratic Republic of the Congo about initiatives that might make a difference in a part of the world that too many have written off as a lost cause. These are the kinds of opportunities offered by our Worldwide Anglican Communion.

I learned pretty quickly that just saying, “I’m going to the Congo,” produces an array of reactions. They’ve ranged from “Are you out of your mind?” to “What a fascinating opportunity.”

To many, “the Congo” suggests jungles, wars, poverty, violence, anarchy, death—none of it positive. It’s as if Joseph Conrad’s 1903 novel, “Heart of Darkness,” with its setting in the colonial-era Congo and its theme of the evil within us, has forever marked this land. Refugees from that part of the world have a mix of emotions about their homeland. Still others would see any trip to a poverty-wracked failed state that desperately needs friends and support as a kind of pilgrimage.

What’s clear is that, unless you have a personal connection to this immense swath of central Africa, your knowledge of the Congo is likely to be hazy at best. That’s the main reason I feel so fortunate to have an opportunity to go there, and why I’m so grateful that our Episcopal Church shares a bond with the Anglican Province of the Congo.

The Congo already seems to me to be the biggest humanitarian crisis in the world about which the American public knows so little. Clearly, there are stories to be told and shared.

The part of the DR Congo we will be visiting is well into its third chapter of a dispersed, complicated war that has lasted for two decades and claimed millions of lives. As Jason K. Stearns writes in “Dancing in the Glory of Monsters,” his fascinating history of the Congo, the wars of the past two decades, with dozens of competing factions, militias and nations, are like “layers of an onion, wars within wars.”

The opening round included the horrible genocide in Rwanda, with its spillover of refugees into the neighboring eastern Congo. The restiveness continues today, with armed militias roaming the country and the basic infrastructure barely sustained. Corruption, sickness and violence are widespread.

Out of this humanitarian morass come church-backed proposals to offer relief to those who have borne so much, particularly the children. Hope survives. There’s much to be done. And the toughest challenge, as Stearns observes, is to offer the kind of help that doesn’t impose the West’s vision on the country but that helps provide an environment for growth and stability among the Congolese themselves.

I give thanks for the bonds of the Anglican Communion that sustain this hoped-for collaboration between the Dioceses of Virginia and Bukavu. I will tell many stories from this trip. I hope they will be the kind of stories that offer a more nuanced view than our simplified shorthand for “the Congo.” And I hope that they address in some small way what Stearns calls the West’s biggest sin of omission when it comes to the Congo: We simply don’t care enough.

–Ed Jones, Editor

3 Comments

Filed under Pre-Convention Coverage

Straining Gnats, Swallowing Camels Part II

Read Part I of “Straining Gnats, Swallowing Camels.”

One approach is to try to change the system from within.

But as we’re learning, camels don’t digest quickly. Bishop Provenzano’s “William White is Dead” proposal, and Bishop Sauls’ proposal  to refocus the mission of the Episcopal Church on all things mission, are generating lots of resistance.

Those who author the vast majority of the resolutions at diocesan conventions and the General Convention – and who in turn serve on the committees, commissions, agencies and boards that those conventions authorize – pretty much like the system the way it is: As Bishop Provenzano writes, “There are too many people involved and invested in the power that comes from deep and cumbersome organization that has become increasingly bureaucratic.”

The very fact that Bishop Provenzano and Bishop Sauls are naming the source of our institutional indigestion is a hopeful sign.

But I don’t think that is how real or lasting change will take place in the Episcopal Church.

Rather, I’ve come to believe in the concept of “parallel growth change.”

“Parallel growth” is a strategy apparently adopted by some major corporations that face issues similar to the Episcopal Church: outdated structures, bloated budgets, overly centralized and irrelevant systems.

The theory is this: Those interested in change should resist the temptation to battle the system or try to change the dominant, inherited culture – battles that only end up causing turf wars because people tend protect “the way things are.”

Rather, leaders who are in favor of change are encouraged to all but ignore “the system” and concentrate almost all their efforts on encouraging healthy franchises – those local retailers that are doing well in spite of “corporate” policy or procedures.

The analogy isn’t perfect – we’re not a corporation – but how that looks in the Episcopal Church is that people who are in favor of change should all but ignore “the system” and concentrate their efforts on encouraging healthy congregations – those congregations that are growing and mission-minded in spite of diocesan or “national” structures.

Where it gets really fascinating is this: “Parallel growth” assumes that one day all those healthy local franchises grow so much they eventually become the majority.

And then there is a revolution – an almost overnight toppling of those antiquated structures because the (now) majority simply won’t put up with it.

Rather than the slow, steady – and resisted-every-step-of-the-way – change favored by those who benefit from slow change, there is lots of parallel growth happening everywhere … and then there’s a palace coup.

My hope is to still be around – covering General Conventions and active in ministry – when that happens in the Episcopal Church.

It sure will be a lot more fun than watching deputies and bishops strain out gnats from their wine while munching down on camel burgers.

–The Rev. John Ohmer, Center Aisle Staff Writer

2 Comments

Filed under A Parish Priest's Perspective, Pre-Convention Coverage

Straining Gnats, Swallowing Camels: Part I

I’m beginning to wonder if “GC” stands for “General Convention” of the Episcopal Church, or “Gnats and Camels.”

You know the reference: Jesus noticed religious leaders who were meticulous about the smallest points of the law – to the point of tithing even one sprig of mint – but who ignored things that really matter.

Using a bit of hyperbolic humor, he says, “Blind guides, you strain out the gnat and swallow the camel.”

Gnats, as insects, were considered unclean. So the religious leaders of Jesus’ day carefully strained their camelwine to keep from accidentally swallowing a gnat.

The picture he paints is that of religious leaders squinting at fine gauze to be sure they’ve captured pinhead-sized impurities, while camels – also unclean animals that were forbidden as food – have been swallowed whole.

It’s meant to be a comical portrayal.

But it’s a painfully accurate picture of the General Convention.
Every three years, General Convention spends days meticulously straining out gnats in countless resolutions while the camels of outdated and irrelevant Church Center departments and offices  and the more than 75 committees, commissions, agencies and boards work their way through our bloated budget belly.

Just to give one example from the General Convention of 2009, our bishops – fine, articulate, passionate, sane and devout people when you meet them individually – spent some of their precious time together as brothers and sisters in Christ debating an amendment to an amendment to the fourth resolved clause to a substitute resolution.

To do what?

To ask General Convention to request the Joint Standing Committee on Program, Budget and Finance to spend $300,000 to implement the substitute resolution, which called for the appointment of 14 people to develop a 10-year plan, updated annually, that would identify and track “the missional, financial, societal, cultural and other challenges and opportunities facing The Episcopal Church” and define “measurable indicators of success of the selected direction.”

In other words, we Episcopalians passed a resolution authorizing ourselves to spend an amount of money probably three times the size of the average Episcopal congregation’s annual budget…to find out what our problem is.

And report back on it.

To ourselves.

The “challenges and opportunities” the Episcopal Church faces are not something 14 people need to spend three years and a third of a million dollars on: It’s something that any rector or senior warden of a growing and vibrant church can tell you in five minutes.  (And it’s something that’s applicable at all levels of church governance, from vestry meetings to diocesan councils to the General Convention to Lambeth.)

And that is the degree to which we still see ourselves when we gather, as legislative bodies that happen to worship and have fellowship together, rather than as a worshipping and fellowship body that happens to legislate.

The first model – the church gathered as legislative bodies that happen to break bread and pray – is a Christendom-era understanding that – if it ever worked – has been chasing its own tail in this country since the 1950s.

The second model – the church gathered in order to engage in (I read this somewhere) “the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, the breaking of bread, and the prayers,” with an absolute minimal amount of time spent on essential housekeeping matters – is an Acts/pre- and non-Christendom model that is emerging again.

How to change from one model to another?

That’s where it gets interesting.

Stay tuned for Part II of “Straining Gnats, Swallowing Camels” later this week.

–The Rev. John Ohmer, Center Aisle Staff Writer

4 Comments

Filed under A Parish Priest's Perspective, Pre-Convention Coverage

Has the Episcopal Church Lost Its Center?

As Center Aisle launches its digital edition this month, the first chapter of its fifth round of service as the Diocese of Virginia’s opinion journal at General Convention, I’m hearing two big questions about this 12-year-old publication:

Has the “center” shifted in the Episcopal Church, with the departure of some members and the arrival of others?

In a year when, for the first time in recent history, no controversial resolutions were introduced at the Annual Council of the Diocese, does General Convention still need a journal aimed at building unity within the church?

The answers are “no” and “yes.”

It’s true you can argue that the “center” has shifted in terms of a growing consensus on issues like same-gender blessings—issues that have been divisive within the Church for many years. But the “center” in Center Aisle has never been gauged as the midpoint of an ideological or theological line. We’re not mushy moderates pushing everyone toward the middle at any cost.

The “center” we’re talking about is the midpoint of a circle, not a line. It refers to our belief that the foundational center of our church, the fundamental core beliefs that bring us together at the foot of the cross, are more powerful than the divisive spats of one General Convention. Far from being milquetoast moderates, those who work for Center Aisle are radical centrists who see the dynamic core of our Church as full of passion and free of malice.

As for the paucity of controversy at Annual Council, don’t be misled into thinking that Episcopalians can’t work up a head of steam over plenty of issues on the GC agenda. After all, we managed at Council to find a way to debate an amendment to an amendment to a canonical change. That’s nothing compared to what’s coming up at General Convention.

Here’s a short list of what’s ahead: the proposed Anglican Covenant; recommendations to change the structure of the national Church and of General Convention; more about same-gender blessings; possible changes in denominational health plans; intense budgetary discussions; communion of the baptized; and the nominating committee for the next Presiding Bishop.

Yes, there will be plenty to debate and discuss. And Center Aisle, with an enhanced digital presence and an emphasis on interactivity, will be there to encourage debates that reflect, not only the diverse points of views within our church, but the commonality among us as Christians.

Our staff in Indianapolis for the July 4 through 12 convention will be rich with experience and overflowing with energy. At the top of our team is the Rt. Rev. Shannon Johnston, bishop of Virginia. Emily Cherry, communications officer for the Diocese, will again serve as our indispensable managing editor.

Returning for their fifth General Convention assignment as reporters and commentators are the Rev. John Ohmer, rector of St. James’, Leesburg; and the Rev. Lauren Stanley, whose missionary work has included assignments in Sudan (now South Sudan) and Haiti. Back for a second turn at Center Aisle is Matthew Lukens, a former bishop’s clerk and now a Virginia postulant at Yale Divinity School, who will be specializing in our digital content. We’re also hoping to entice Mike Kerr, whose day job is treasurer of the Diocese, to man once again his post as editorial cartoonist extraordinaire.

We’ll also have a team of volunteers to help with everything from distribution of our daily print edition (via a red wagon in front of the convention hall) to youth members who will give us their take on issues, big and small.

The content from our staff and from a wide range of guest contributors will range from the weighty and theological to the light and funny. After all, General Convention is an opportunity not only to deliberate but to celebrate.

There is still much to do to make our church the reconciling force in the world it seems naturally suited to be. We look forward to the lively, passionate debates ahead.

Ed Jones
Editor

Leave a Comment

Filed under News and Information

Back for Another Round

General Convention LogoAs the 77th General Convention of the Episcopal Church looms on the horizon – July 5-12 in Indianapolis – the Diocese of Virginia is preparing for another go at Center Aisle, the daily opinion Journal offered as a gift to General Convention.

New this year, we’ll highlight pre-Convention essays and contributions from guest and staff writers, available exclusively online.

Until then, check out our Center Aisle archives to get a sense of what we’re about.

See you in Indianapolis!

Comments Off

Filed under News and Information